w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from July 2002 by date

Thursday, 1 August 2002

• weekly call for agenda items Eric Miller

Wednesday, 31 July 2002

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 (rdfms-assertion) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: single property not required (Datatypes) Aaron Swartz
• Re: single property not required [was: Missing F2F IRC logs 2002-06-18 [was Re: Datatypes]] Dave Beckett
• single property not required [was: Missing F2F IRC logs 2002-06-18 [was Re: Datatypes]] Aaron Swartz
• Re: A data typing proposal Patrick Stickler
• Re: A data typing proposal Graham Klyne
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 (rdfms-assertion) Graham Klyne
• Missing F2F IRC logs 2002-06-18 [was Re: Datatypes] Dave Beckett
• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Patrick Stickler
• Re: A data typing proposal Patrick Stickler
• A data typing proposal R.V.Guha

Tuesday, 30 July 2002

• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 (rdfms-assertion) Dan Connolly
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 pat hayes
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Graham Klyne
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Frank Manola
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Graham Klyne
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Graham Klyne
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Dave Beckett
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Dave Beckett
• New tests Jeremy Carroll
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Frank Manola

Monday, 29 July 2002

• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Dan Connolly
• Re: nodes and node labels [was New document: revised version for WG review] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 pat hayes

Monday, 29 July 2002

• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Graham Klyne
• New document: revised version for WG review Graham Klyne
• Re: Review new document [was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Graham Klyne
• Re: Review new document [was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Jos De_Roo

Sunday, 28 July 2002

• Re: Review new document [was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Graham Klyne
• Re: Miscellanea [was Re: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Graham Klyne
• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Dan Connolly
• Re: Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Patrick Stickler
• Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 27 July 2002

• Review new document [was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Jos De_Roo
• Datatypes [Was: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Jos De_Roo
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Miscellanea (off-topic) Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 26 July 2002

• Miscellanea [was Re: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002] Frank Manola
• Re: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002 Graham Klyne
• Minutes telecon 26th July 2002 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes telecon 26th July 2002 Jeremy Carroll
• regrets Aaron Swartz
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 Graham Klyne
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 Graham Klyne
• Re: More tests Jeremy Carroll
• new Primer version Frank Manola
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-26 Eric Miller

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Graham Klyne
• Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Dave Beckett
• Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document Graham Klyne
• Re: weekly call for agenda items Graham Klyne
• Re: More tests Jan Grant

Wednesday, 24 July 2002

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Graham Klyne

Thursday, 25 July 2002

• Colon in ID - test case Jeremy Carroll
• More tests Jeremy Carroll
• Tests for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 24 July 2002

• weekly call for agenda items Eric Miller
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Frank Manola

Tuesday, 23 July 2002

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Graham Klyne
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Dave Beckett
• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Graham Klyne

Monday, 22 July 2002

• regrets pat hayes

Saturday, 20 July 2002

• Re: Proccess to last call Graham Klyne
• Re: datatypes input Jos De_Roo
• [Fwd: LC comments on SOAP 1.2 adjuncts: re SOAP Encoding (re URIs, test suite, SOAP Data Model Schemas?)] Dan Brickley

Friday, 19 July 2002

• Re: datatypes input Jos De_Roo
• Going on hols Brian McBride
• Re: Proccess to last call Brian McBride
• regrets for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-19 Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proccess to last call Graham Klyne
• Re: current action list Graham Klyne

Thursday, 18 July 2002

• Re: datatypes input Graham Klyne
• Re: Proccess to last call Graham Klyne
• Re: daml:collection is just Literal test: need help with details [was: current action list] Dave Beckett
• Re: Proccess to last call Dan Connolly
• Re: Proccess to last call Brian McBride
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 Brian McBride
• Re: current action list Dan Connolly
• daml:collection is just Literal test: need help with details [was: current action list] Dan Connolly
• Re: Proccess to last call Dan Connolly
• rdfms-xmllang/test006 and xml specs Aaron Swartz
• current action list Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Proccess to last call Brian McBride
• Re: datatypes input Jos De_Roo
• Re: Out of Office AutoReply: Draft datatypes message Aaron Swartz
• Re: datatypes input Aaron Swartz
• Re: datatypes input Dan Connolly
• Re: datatypes input Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Brian McBride
• Re: datatypes input Dan Connolly
• Re: Draft datatypes message Aaron Swartz
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Dan Connolly
• Re: datatypes input Brian McBride
• Re: datatypes input Dan Connolly
• Re: mini SOAP review Jan Grant
• Re: mini SOAP review Dan Brickley
• AT RISK: coordination of RDF Core WG's SOAP 1.2 / XML Protocol Last Call review comments - consider sending individual reviews Dan Brickley
• Re: mini SOAP review Jan Grant
• mini SOAP review Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Dave Beckett
• datatypes input Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes of RDFCore telecon 2002-06-14 Jos De_Roo

Wednesday, 17 July 2002

• Re: Minutes of RDFCore telecon 2002-06-14 Dan Brickley
• CC/PP on XML Namespaces, RDF Schemas and RDF Schema documents Dave Beckett
• Minutes of RDFCore telecon 2002-06-14 Brian McBride
• Re: test case A revisited Brian McBride

Friday, 12 July 2002

• Re: test case A revisited pat hayes

Wednesday, 17 July 2002

• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Re: Primer: some vocabulary questions Frank Manola
• regrets 19th July Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 16 July 2002

• Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete Graham Klyne
• Re: Primer: some vocabulary questions Graham Klyne
• Re: TEST: literals Jos De_Roo
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-07-12 Dave Beckett
• rdfms-syntax-incomplete Jeremy Carroll
• Re: TEST: literals Dave Beckett
• regrets 7/19 telecon Frank Manola
• Primer: some vocabulary questions Frank Manola

Monday, 15 July 2002

• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Patrick Stickler
• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• Re: Documented MIME-type dependency of fragment identifiers Graham Klyne
• SOAP data model - comparison with RDF Graham Klyne

Friday, 12 July 2002

• Re: Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 Frank Manola
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 Brian McBride
• joining slightly late Dan Brickley
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 Mike Dean
• RE: datatypes discussion on other lists Brian McBride
• Re: datatypes discussion on other lists Patrick Stickler
• Re: literals, again. Patrick Stickler
• RE: datatypes discussion on other lists Jeremy Carroll
• Re: datatypes discussion on other lists Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 11 July 2002

• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 Ronald Daniel
• datatypes discussion on other lists Brian McBride
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-12 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Frank Manola
• RE: editorial guideline: representing triples Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 10 July 2002

• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Brian McBride
• Re: test case A and superProperty pat hayes
• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Frank Manola
• Re: editorial guideline: representing triples Dan Connolly
• editorial guideline: representing triples Brian McBride
• editorial guidelines Brian McBride
• weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• Implementing RDF datatyping in Jena2 Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 9 July 2002

• Re: test case A revisited Brian McBride
• Re: test case: Test case A and reification Brian McBride
• RE: test case: Test case A and reification Jeremy Carroll
• RE: test case A revisited Jeremy Carroll
• Re: test case: Test case A and reification pat hayes

Monday, 8 July 2002

• Re: test case A revisited pat hayes
• Re: literals, again. pat hayes
• Re: datatypes: new information - email delayed awaiting WG response pat hayes
• Re: Documented MIME-type dependency of fragment identifiers Frank Manola
• Regrets for telecon: 2002-07-12 and 2002-07-19 Graham Klyne
• Re: Documented MIME-type dependency of fragment identifiers Graham Klyne

Friday, 5 July 2002

• Re: Documented MIME-type dependency of fragment identifiers Frank Manola
• URI resolving tests for .Net Uri class Dave Beckett
• SOAP WDs Jeremy Carroll
• Documented MIME-type dependency of fragment identifiers Graham Klyne

Thursday, 4 July 2002

• regrets, telecon 2002-07-05 and telecon 2002-07-12 Jos De_Roo
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-07-05 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• regrets, telecon 2002-07-05 Sergey Melnik
• Datatypes and Java (was Re: datatypes: new information - email delayed awaiting WG response) Sergey Melnik
• Re: datatypes: new information - email delayed awaiting WG response Brian McBride

Wednesday, 3 July 2002

• Re: datatypes: new information - email delayed awaiting WG response Graham Klyne
• some comments on the new RDF document Frank Manola
• call for agenda items Brian McBride
• datatypes: new information - email delayed awaiting WG response Brian McBride
• Re: Please revert application/rdf+xml on the W3C site Henri Fallon
• Please revert application/rdf+xml on the W3C site Ralph R. Swick

Tuesday, 2 July 2002

• Re: RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-06-28 Graham Klyne
• RDFCore WG minutes for the Telecon 2002-06-28 Eric Miller
• New RDF document - proposed reassignment of material Graham Klyne
• Re: "For Sale-- 320 Ton/Day RDF Incinerator facility" Frank Manola
• regrets, telecon 2002-07-05 Jan Grant

Monday, 1 July 2002

• Re: Outline for new RDF document Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 2 July 2002

• Re: test case A revisited Patrick Stickler
• Re: test case A revisited Patrick Stickler
• Re: test case A and superProperty Patrick Stickler
• Re: test case: Test case A and reification Patrick Stickler
• Re: test case A revisited Patrick Stickler
• Re: "For Sale-- 320 Ton/Day RDF Incinerator facility" Patrick Stickler

Monday, 1 July 2002

• "For Sale-- 320 Ton/Day RDF Incinerator facility" Frank Manola
• test case A and superProperty Brian McBride
• RE: test case A revisited Brian McBride
• test case: Test case A and reification Brian McBride
• Re: Syntax: id symbol expansion Dave Beckett
• RE: test case A revisited Jan Grant
• RE: test case A revisited Jeremy Carroll
• Re: test case A revisited Patrick Stickler
• test case A revisited Brian McBride
• RE: procedure for determining reserved vocab Jan Grant
• RE: literals, again. Dan Brickley
• RE: procedure for determining reserved vocab Jeremy Carroll
• RE: literals, again. Jeremy Carroll

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2002 20:55:30 UTC