W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: Overview and Abstract Data Model - new document

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:40:06 +0100
Message-ID: <3D466D06.9020207@hpl.hp.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>

> And charmod?  If you add a dependency here - and it is an addition -
> it's to a WD, not a REC and it would be a new thing that RDF
> implementors would have to look at.  I'm pretty confident we decided
> not to depend on charmod in it's current non-REC state.

See comment in section 4.1. This section is the only one that 
normatively depends on charmod.

The problem here is that the concept of early uniform normalization is 
sufficiently large amount of text to explain that the reference is the 
only realistic way to do it.

I think we formally decided to go with early uniform normalization; I 
could try and dig up a reference.

At some level I see this as a negotiating position with the I18N WG. 
This para indicates that we are willing, as long as they progress.
  It is quite likely that we will have to remove it, and then Charmod 
will be demoted to an informative reference.

Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 06:40:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:14 UTC