W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2002

Re: datatypes input

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:40:06 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 08:51 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 05:54, Brian McBride wrote:
> >
> > I've just sent summaries of the results so far:
> >
> >    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Jul/0073.html
> >
> > Untidy is in the lead.
>This isn't a popularity contest, is it?

Err, well, err.. yes.

>We're collecting ideas, not votes, right?

We got to the point in our analysis where it seemed like it came down to a 
choice of which functionality was more important, the entailment you 
suggested or the Cannes entailment.

My understanding is that we decided to ask the community which of these 
they thought was more important.  This we are doing.  After one of the two 
weeks allowed for feedback have elapsed, there indications are that the 
segment of the community which is responding is favoring untidy.

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 10:41:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:14 UTC