- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 03:18:47 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
From http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020617-f2f/ I think it's covered by this decision: [[ log The WG decided to consider producing a new document to describe the RDF graph, possibly called "Resource Description Framework". This will include description of the graph synax, what it means to assert, character normalization and possibly some other material from the primer. Graham and Jeremy to be editors. ]] in the sense that it's become a document issue. There was some discussion at the f2f of the assertion issue against a background of social aspects of RDF deployment (in discussions in/after the telecon prior to the F2F, the omission of any discussion of the social environment of RDF deployment had been noted). Section 2.3 of the new RDF document [1] resulted from this. Assertion is covered at sub-section 2.3.4 [2] (and still needs review/discussion). #g -- [1] http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-06-27/Overview.htm#section-Meaning [2] http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-06-27/Overview.htm#section-Asserting At 05:14 PM 7/18/02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: >On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 17:06, Brian McBride wrote: > > At 16:50 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 16:21, Brian McBride wrote: > > > > > > > > Up till now we have been using an issue driven process and that has > served > > > > us well, but now that we are down to one open issue, > > > > > >Which one is that? > > > > > >I see a number of issues "for discussion"; in particular, > > >http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion > > > > Datatypes. Issue list needs updating. I'm behind. Sorry. > >Quite allright; but it's news to me that rdfms-assertion >is resolved. I looked pretty hard for a record of >a decision to resolve it, and I couldn't find one. > >Brian's clearly got plenty to do; can anybody *else* >help me find a record of a decision to close >rdfms-assertion? > >There's not a lot of urgency, but if somebody >has it handy... > > > > > Brian >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 22:06:11 UTC