- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 28 Jul 2002 09:53:49 -0500
- To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 03:38, Patrick Stickler wrote: [...] > > but there are > > still three or four viable candidates: > > > > - untidy > > - tidy > > - two properties > > This has already been rejected by the WG. I don't recall any such decision. Giving your position on the issue is fine, but if you're going to cite group decisions, please do so by reference to the record. [...] > The WG has already decided that datatyping should work by one of the > two proposed options, which decision are you referring to here? > based on the tidyness of literals, or lack > thereof. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you in Montreal in August at Extreme Markup 2002?
Received on Sunday, 28 July 2002 10:53:32 UTC