- From: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Date: 25 Jul 2002 20:41:52 -0400
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time: 10:00:00 Fri Jul 26 2002 in America/New York which is equivalent to 15:00:00 Fri Jul 26 2002 in Europe/London Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332 irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore 1: Volunteer scribe 2: Roll Call 3: Review Agenda 4: Next telecon Aug 2nd 2002 5: Review minutes of 2002-07-19 teleconference hmm.... no minutes seem to be available but I find http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc which indicates jang scribed? (please confirm) 6: Status of Action Items Proposed Closed Items Open Items ACTION: 2002-05-31#4 bwm add "see also" links between rdfms-containers other approaches and rdfms-seq-representation in the issues list document ACTION: danbri, eric Identify who owns the publishing next steps and responsibilities for LBase Note context: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc.html#T14-13-49 ACTION: jang update test cases in light of bugs</dd> context: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc#T14-34-20 ACTION: eric Look into why jang gets dropped on rdf-comments list and fix problem context: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc#T14-35-21 ACTION: bwm to identify applications needed and get a schedule for them context: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc#T14-54-10 ACTION: bwm have a good holiday context: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-irc#T15-03-20 Unknown Items (Proposed Closed) ACTION: 2002-06-28#2 bwm get editors together, review contents of documents see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0081.html http://www.w3.org/2002/07/19-rdfcore-wg#T14-42-15 7) rdf:ID / rdf:node proposal [[ The chair was keen that we avoid too much discussion. I would like to highlight the choicepoints. ]] -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0080.html I'm keen on this as well - review choicepoints and be prepared to discuss. a follow-up useful for establishing my view as well [[ This chairs position was to not reopen the issue at this time, but to indicate that if a slam dunk proposal was submitted to the WG, then I would not be opposed, provided it did not delay us. ]] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0108.html 8) New Document A new draft of 'Resource Description Framework (RDF): Overview and Abstract Data Model' is available at: http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-07-25/Overview.html Graham to do quick intro; Graham if you have specific issues that need to be addressed by individuals/editors, please be prepared to discuss this as well. Graham, in particular see next agenda item. 9) rdfns-assertion See: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion I'm frankly confused if this issue is open or not, but I think this issue is addressed in Graham's document but still needs review - [[ There was some discussion at the f2f of the assertion issue against a background of social aspects of RDF deployment (in discussions in/after the telecon prior to the F2F, the omission of any discussion of the social environment of RDF deployment had been noted). Section 2.3 of the new RDF document resulted from this. Assertion is covered at sub-section 2.3.4 (and still needs review/discussion). ]] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0130.html If I am wrong I'm happy simply to have this noted and skip over this :) 10) Procedure for determining reserved vocabulary ACTION:2002-06-28#1 jjc write a message about possible bug in guha's option#2 See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jun/0205.html From last week, as we have not made a decision on this, WG please be prepared to do so. 11) Schedule and Process to Last Call See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0114.html I'd like to present Brian with a present when he returns from a well-deserved vacation. 12) Datatypes err.. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? ------------------------------------------------------------ This agenda *really wanted to be* produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant -- eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/ semantic web activity lead http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ w3c world wide web consortium http://www.w3.org/
Received on Thursday, 25 July 2002 20:41:55 UTC