- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:04:42 +0100
- To: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 08:41 PM 7/25/02 -0400, Eric Miller wrote: >9) rdfns-assertion > >See: > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion > >I'm frankly confused if this issue is open or not, but I think this >issue is addressed in Graham's document but still needs review - That's spot on, as far as I'm concerned. I invite folks to review section 2.3 in: http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/RDF-basics/2002-07-25/Overview.htm#section-Meaning which attempts an account of the social context of RDF deployment, and in particular section 2.3.2 which I believe tackles the assertion issue as raised. The subsequent sub-sections try to explain how the social and formal aspects can work together. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 04:45:37 UTC