- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:37:58 +0300
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
I like it as well (but hope the explanation includes a clear
statement that folks aren't supposed to actually use that
notation in practice ;-)
Cheers,
Patrick
On 2002-07-15 10:55, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:
>
> At 04:26 PM 7/10/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>
>> It has been suggested that we adopt a common notation across all the specs
>> for representing triples.
>>
>> I suggest we use legal n-triples with the addition that a URI can be
>> represented as a qname without angle brackets, e.g.
>>
>> _:a rdf:type rdfs:Class .
>>
>> The notation should be explained in the primer which should include a list
>> of standard prefixes. The other documents should reference the
>> description in the primer.
>
> I like that (as a way of presenting triples for human consumption).
>
> #g
>
>
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 09:37:39 UTC