- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:41:45 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:18 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >Is the Cannes entailment the thing that was called Jeremy's entailment >in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-3 ? Yes. Jeremy was bashful so we renamed it. >That can be handled without resorting to untidy literals. > >I did some test cases to show that a while ago... > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/datatypeAtoB.n3 If I interpret that properly, then you need two properties, say <age> and <ageL>. My understanding is that WG agrees that this works, but that having two properties is unacceptable. If we agreed that two properties was acceptable, then I think all this would just go away. The argument is that there will be lots of user error and confusion resulting from having to distinguish between the two cases. >I guess I don't have time to keep up. Sorry. I do wish you could. Brian
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 11:43:06 UTC