- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 17:19:27 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > > > I have implemented the new Syntax in ARP. > I had a few issues, mainly with the test cases. > One substantive issue with the text is as follows: Ooh, deja vu ;) http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20010906/#rdf-id Jeremy proposes: > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/#NT-NCName > > the namespaces NCName construct. and I support this. NT-NCName is a term in the Namespaces in XML Recommendation (1999) but make sense to use since it is what W3C XML Schema data types uses for (XML) ID aka xsd:ID 3.3.8 ID [[ID represents the ID attribute type from [XML 1.0 (Second Edition)]. The value space of ID is the set of all strings that match the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML]. The lexical space of ID is the set of all strings that match the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML]. The base type of ID is NCName. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#ID so if we want to ever write an W3C XML Schema for RDF/XML, it would be good if these were compatible. The 'name' term in N-Triples http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#name was very early on related to this issue but is now defined entirely in that document and we don't need to change it. Dave
Received on Monday, 1 July 2002 12:19:31 UTC