- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:57:34 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > > > Proposal in brief: > > - use attribute rdf:node to associate node identifiers with blank nodes. > - file scoped identifier. > - any XML string is legal blank node identifier. I'd suggest maybe that rdf:node take values the same as rdf:ID, that way it never looks like a URI-ref, and has the scope for validation using the same XSD type and same code as used for rdf:ID (and rdf:bagID). It is a separate namesp^w (oops!) set of names from the rdf:ID names of course. > > Full resolution: > - reopen issue rdfms-syntax-incomplete > - add an attribute rdf:node to the RDF/XML syntax. > - modify the syntax to permit rdf:node in place of rdf:about. > - such a use associates the value of the attribute as a file scoped > identifier for the blank node > - modify the syntax to permit rdf:node in place of rdf:resource. > - such a use associates the value of the attribute as a file scoped > identifier for the blank node > - any two blank nodes arising from the same RDF/XML file with the same > identifier are the same blank node > - action syntax editor to update the document to reflect this > - rdf:node is not permitted as an element name in RDF/XML > - action jjc to produce test cases > - action daveb to update rdfms-names-use to reflect rdf:node > - close issue Dave
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 06:57:39 UTC