Re: editorial guideline: representing triples

At 04:26 PM 7/10/02 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:

>It has been suggested that we adopt a common notation across all the specs 
>for representing triples.
>
>I suggest we use legal n-triples with the addition that a URI can be 
>represented as a qname without angle brackets, e.g.
>
>   _:a rdf:type rdfs:Class .
>
>The notation should be explained in the primer which should include a list 
>of standard prefixes.  The other documents should reference the 
>description in the primer.

I like that (as a way of presenting triples for human consumption).

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 04:25:24 UTC