Tuesday, 31 August 2010
- RE: Use Case template
- Re: Use Case template
- Re: Similar Use cases?
- Multiple Regrets
- Use Case Vocabulary Merging
- Re: Use Case template
Monday, 30 August 2010
Friday, 27 August 2010
- Re: Similar Use cases?
- Re: Similar Use cases?
- Minutes of 2010-07-26 LLD meeting
- AW: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: Similar Use cases?
- Note on use case (data) scope
- Use Case template
- Re: F2F Pittsburgh attendance
- Re: F2F Pittsburgh attendance
- Re: Similar Use cases?
- F2F Pittsburgh attendance
Thursday, 26 August 2010
- Action "Editing use-case" delivered, Regrets for next two weeks
- Use Case: National Digital Newspaper Program
- Introduction: hbz and Anette Seiler
Wednesday, 25 August 2010
- Re: Cataloguing terminology
- Re: Cataloguing terminology
- Similar Use cases?
- Cataloguing terminology
- Use case: Europeana
- Re: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct)
Tuesday, 24 August 2010
- Re: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct)
- RE: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct)
- Agenda - August 26 2010 - LLD XG telecon - 1400 UTC
- Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct)
- Use case: Language Technology
- Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18
Monday, 23 August 2010
Sunday, 22 August 2010
- Re: linkable library data
- Re: linkable library data
- Re: linkable library data
- Re: linkable library data
- Re: linkable library data
- linkable library data
Friday, 20 August 2010
- Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18
- Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18
- Correction, yesterday was the 19th.
- Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18
Thursday, 19 August 2010
Tuesday, 17 August 2010
Monday, 16 August 2010
Saturday, 14 August 2010
- RE: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
- Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
- Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
- Re: Possible use case
- Re: Possible use case
- Re: Possible use case
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: Possible use case
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
Friday, 13 August 2010
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: Possible use case
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- SWIB10 Conference in Cologne, 29./30. Nov.
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: Possible use case
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
Thursday, 12 August 2010
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Possible use case
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
Wednesday, 11 August 2010
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Use Case Publishing 20th Century Press Archives / Template
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
Tuesday, 10 August 2010
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: Is unique Work identifiers as use case?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Is unique Work identifiers as use case?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
Monday, 9 August 2010
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- RE: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Fwd: Cataloguing Bibliographic Data with Natural Language and RDF
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?
- Re: is FRBR relevant?