Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18

Emmanuelle, Gordon,

Thanks for the comments!
I was waiting to hear whether Gordon has other remarks, but I guess this won't happen now, so I updated http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/08/19-lld-minutes.html#item07.

For Gordon's clarification on FRBR I just made a link to the mail below, as it is quite long.

Cheers,

Antoine


>
>
> Ross, Emmanuelle and others
>
> This is still not correct.
>
> FRBR is not deprecated in favour of a consolidated model. I said (or
> intended to say that) it is likely to be deprecated when (and if) a
> consolidated model is developed and authorised. (Work on the
> consolidated model has commenced, and is expected to take at least a
> year.) The FRBR Review Group will publish an authorised RDF
> representation of FRBR within a month, and clearly it will not be
> deprecated as soon as it is published.
>
> The IFLA Namespaces Working Group is being developed, but may take some
> time to set up as it is dependent on the development of a "core
> activity" for coordinating and promoting IFLA bibliographic standards.
> The Working Group will advise and assist IFLA in the development and
> maintenance of a technical infrstructure to support standards
> maintenance, coordination and promotion. Bodies responsible for the
> development and maintenance of specific standards will continue to do
> so; these include the FRBR Review Group and the ISBD Review Group. The
> Namespaces Working Group will advise the work on specific standards, and
> is likely to have a role in developing mappings, interoperability, etc.
> between different standards. I therefore sits at a higher level than the
> individual standards groups.
>
> More formal informaton about these developments will appear on the IFLA
> website as minutes and other documentation are created and approved. I
> hope to provide further information for the forthcoming RDA/FRBR agenda
> item.
>
> The note about ISBD is correct.
>
> I'll check the full draft minutes and get back to you if anything else
> requires correction.
>
> Cheers
>
> Gordon
>
> On 20 August 2010 at 15:24 Emmanuelle Bermes <emmanuelle.bermes@bnf.fr>
> wrote:
>
>  > Thank you Ross for your efficient scribing !
>  >
>  > I would like to add 2 things regarding these minutes :
>  >
>  > - the decision regarding the deadline is not really clear in the minutes.
>  > We agreed on the call that we would stick to the 25th August as a
> deadline
>  > to come up with a little number of well curated use cases, so that we can
>  > discuss them and validate the template. But LLD members can
> contribute use
>  > cases after this date.
>  >
>  > - in Gordon's report there are some crucial things missing, I suggest to
>  > complete like that (if Gordon is OK, of course) :
>  >
>  >
>  > > GordonD: FRBR, as is, is deprecated in favor of a consolidated model
>  > > combining FRBR and FRSAD
>  > >
>  > A specific Namespaces task group has been created within IFLA to work on
>  > expressing FRBR as RDF
>  > Also work on another standard, ISBD : International Standard...
>  >
>  > > ... bibliographic description different than FRBR, more similar to
>  > > RDA
>  > > ... specific rules about how elements should be displayed
>  > > ... will use a DC application profile for this
>  > > ... will feed back into DCMI and LLD
>  > > ... hope to make a crosslinking between FRBR and ISBD
>  > > ... much of the discussion taking place around linked data
>  > >
>  > >
>  >
>  > Best,
>  > Emmanuelle
>  >
>  > --
>  > =====
>  > Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr
>  > Manue - http://www.figoblog.org

Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 08:10:23 UTC