- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 19:51:16 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Michael, thanks for the suggestion. It looks, however, like not all of the > offerings will be data sets. In some cases, the linkable output is generated > on a single-resource basis through an API. What I *can* do is make a > reference to voiD in the documentation, encouraging people to create a voiD > entry if they do have a dataset in an appropriate format. Great idea Karen! I'm not a VoID expert, but I think that scenario might be describable with void:uriRegexPattern. I think it's a great idea to collect minimal information on the wiki about the availability of library linked data; and then once we've got a good list, digging in and creating some VoID for them. I agree with Antoine, that we shouldn't allow this work to eclipse the Use Case work -- but keeping it really lightweight will help I think. It may even give us potential people to approach about writing a more formal use case. //Ed
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 23:51:43 UTC