- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:52:11 -0700
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
BTW, there is the beginning of a formal definition of FRSAD, but it looks like it may not yet be complete: http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/list/schema_id/26.html There is a property "has Type of nomen" that may hold the key. As usual, Gordon is the one with all of the information :-). kc Quoting Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: >> >Also, I thought frsad:Nomen was analogous to a SKOS label, >> >not a concept (i.e., the range of frsad:soundLabel, not >> >the domain). Do I have it backwards? >> >> Tom, the definitions of Thema and Nomen are: >> >> Thema: any entity used as a subject of a work >> Nomen: any sign or sequence of signs (alphanumeric characters, >> symbols, sound, etc.) by >> which a thema is known, referred to or addressed as. >> >> I read this to mean that Thema = concept, but I'm less sure about >> Nomen because it appears that the term Nomen covers both identifier >> and a prefLabel (see section 6.2 where it gives the attributes of >> Nomen as "identifier" and "controlled name"). > > Thank you, Karen. > > I'm not seeing any reason why Antoine's suggested: > > skosxl:Label rdfs:subClassOf frsad:Nomen . > > would not work. > > Tom > > -- > Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 19:52:49 UTC