AW: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: Similar Use cases?

I totally agree keeping the two UCs separately. Because you have different actors with different interactions.

Best, Alexander

 

Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Emmanuelle Bermes
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. August 2010 09:38
An: Matola, Tod
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Betreff: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: Similar Use cases?

 

This is a comment I wanted to make on the call yesterday, but we ran out of time.

I think Tod's comment on how these 2 use case are very similar is reflecting very well the discussion we had yesterday on the call.
They are actually similar, but they represent two different viewpoints : 
- the "OL data" use case is project-oriented and describes the need for the producer to make his data reusable for other web applications as widely as possible
- the "bibliographic network" use case is user-oriented, more general and quite complementary, he describes the need for bibliographic data on the web, citing OL just as an example; we could even add Libris or others in the "existing work" section ?

Maybe we can consolidate them, but actually I'd rather be in favor of leaving them separate, for the record, but link them in the "related use case" section.

Tod, Karen, Kai, what do you think ?
Emmanuelle

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Matola, Tod <matolat@oclc.org> wrote:

Hello,

I just noticed that Open Library Data [1] and Bibliographic Network [2] use cases are pretty similar. Should we consolidate them or they really covering different cases? It seems like they are just alternate paths. 


[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Open_Library_Data 
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Bibliographic_Network


Cheers Tod
-- 
''You begin saving the world by saving one man at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics.''    
   Charles Bukowski




-- 
=====
Emmanuelle Bermès - http://www.bnf.fr
Manue - http://www.figoblog.org