Re: is FRBR relevant?

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >Also, I thought frsad:Nomen was analogous to a SKOS label,
> >not a concept (i.e., the range of frsad:soundLabel, not
> >the domain).  Do I have it backwards?
> 
> Tom, the definitions of Thema and Nomen are:
> 
> Thema: any entity used as a subject of a work
> Nomen: any sign or sequence of signs (alphanumeric characters,  
> symbols, sound, etc.) by
> which a thema is known, referred to or addressed as.
> 
> I read this to mean that Thema = concept, but I'm less sure about  
> Nomen because it appears that the term Nomen covers both identifier  
> and a prefLabel (see section 6.2 where it gives the attributes of  
> Nomen as "identifier" and "controlled name").

Thank you, Karen.

I'm not seeing any reason why Antoine's suggested:

    skosxl:Label rdfs:subClassOf frsad:Nomen .

would not work.

Tom

-- 
Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>

Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 19:41:09 UTC