public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2020 by author

[ Cassondra ]

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)

A. Wilcox

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Adam Bradley

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)

Adam Murray

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Adam Rice

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add checks before Close and Enqueue in tee() (#1027) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add checks before Close and Enqueue in tee() (#1027) (Thursday, 27 February)
• [whatwg/streams] Add state checks to Close() and Enqueue() (#1029) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Idiomatic Way to Explicitly Tell an Underlying Transform Stream to Flush to the Sink (#960) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• [whatwg/streams] Add checks before Close and Enqueue in tee() (#1027) (Monday, 3 February)

aesyondu

• [w3c/uievents] Event order of onKeyDown, onKeyPress, onKeyUp, and onPaste when using pasting (CMD + v) in Mac OS X (#261) (Saturday, 22 February)

Ahmid

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Specify `ParentNode.replaceChildren` implementation. (#835) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Specify `ParentNode.replaceChildren` implementation. (#835) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: ParentNode.replaceAll() / ParentNode.replaceChildren() (#478) (Monday, 10 February)

Alan Plum

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

alancutter

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Procedure for moving manifests and Apps (#850) (Monday, 17 February)

Alexey Rodionov

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Icon purpose "splashscreen" and splashscreen text (#844) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Monday, 3 February)

Alexey Shvayka

• [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Monday, 3 February)

aliams

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix some incorrect capitalization, and make sections less shouty (#320) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Call out browser versions for new features (#321) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Call out browser versions for new features (#321) (Friday, 28 February)

Alice

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MathML Core (#438) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Amin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Anders

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a "tabbed application" mode (#737) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a "tabbed application" mode (#737) (Saturday, 8 February)

Andrea Giammarchi

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: A Range.prototype.replaceContents(...) (#837) (Friday, 28 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Proposal: A Range.prototype.replaceContents(...) (#837) (Friday, 28 February)

Andreas Hahn

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 27 February)

Andreu Botella

• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: change the remaining flags to booleans (#198) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: change the remaining flags to booleans (#198) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: change the remaining flags to booleans (#198) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [whatwg/encoding] Editorial: change the remaining flags to booleans (#198) (Wednesday, 26 February)

Andrew Comminos

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] isInputPending (#475) (Tuesday, 18 February)

Andrew Sutherland

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Friday, 7 February)

annadane

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response constructor should handle SharedArrayBuffer (#1004) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] What should resolveRelativeUrl(base=..., relative="10.0.0.7:8080/foo.html") return? (#464) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response constructor should handle SharedArrayBuffer (#1004) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Editorial: remove schemeless origin group (#78) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] "A schemeless origin group" has maybe been obsoleted? (#77) (Thursday, 27 February)
• [whatwg/storage] Editorial: remove schemeless origin group (#78) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify the way CORB should be applied to beacons (#882) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify the way CORB should be applied to beacons (#882) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Label single-byte visualization rows by byte value (#197) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/encoding] Label single-byte visualization rows by byte value (#197) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Provide ability to encode content from browser/runtime in fetch API. (#653) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Provide ability to encode content from browser/runtime in fetch API. (#653) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: August 2019 (#252) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: August 2019 (#252) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Allow `object` for attribute names? (#845) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] URL.relative proposal (#421) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Specify `ParentNode.replaceChildren` implementation. (#835) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Project (#844) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#1028) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#267) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#463) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#463) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#267) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#1028) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#1028) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] URLSearchParams.appendAll(iterable) (#461) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Allow ES2020 BigInt values to be passed to operations taking integers. (#828) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Allow ES2020 BigInt values to be passed to operations taking integers. (#828) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider renaming number types to match the equivalent WebAssembly types (#843) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: Missing definitive article (#834) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node insertion step 7.7 isn't upgrading disconnected uncustomized elements that browsers do upgrade (#833) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] More CORB-protected MIME types - safelist-based approach (#721) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Add attribute validate steps. (#809) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] "Remove a node from a parent" reaction callback stuff needs to be conditional on the node being connected before the operation (#773) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update the "convert nodes into a node" to accept arrays of nodes. (#828) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update the "convert nodes into a node" to accept arrays of nodes. (#828) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Bug in methods - entries() and forEach() (#462) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Bug in methods - entries() and forEach() (#462) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] Bug in methods - entries() and forEach() (#462) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Bahavior without browsing context (#82) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Can we use ObjectCreate in object creation? + other editorial tweaks (#655) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Bahavior without browsing context (#82) (Monday, 3 February)
• [w3c/push-api] Make automatic failing normative (#322) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [proposal] Node.containingShadowRoot (#826) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [proposal] Node.containingShadowRoot (#826) (Saturday, 1 February)

Armando Faz

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Sunday, 9 February)

Armin Sebastian

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

arturjanc

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Thursday, 6 February)

Asa Kusuma

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Wednesday, 26 February)

autokagami

• [w3c/gamepad] [gamepad-extensions] Align with Web IDL specification (#126) (Saturday, 22 February)

bart7951

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)

baybal

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Becca Hughes

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Media Feeds API (#477) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Ben Kelly

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Monday, 3 February)

bhartvigsen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Bo Cupp

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] EditContext API (#416) (Tuesday, 25 February)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider renaming number types to match the equivalent WebAssembly types (#843) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (#836) (Saturday, 1 February)

Born

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Brad Isbell

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)

Brian Grinstead

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Brian Kardell

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MathML Core (#438) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MathML Core (#438) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MathML Core (#438) (Saturday, 1 February)

C. Scott Ananian

• Re: [whatwg/dom] createElementNS() QName/Name confusion (#671) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Caleb Williams

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Caridy Patiño

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 25 February)

Chris Griffin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Christian Biesinger

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS intrinsic-size (#437) (Thursday, 13 February)

cynthia

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MiniApp URI Scheme (#478) (Friday, 28 February)

Dan Sanders

• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Monday, 3 February)

Daniel Appelquist

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Delegated Ink Trail (#473) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] EditContext API (#416) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Feature Policy: Document Policies (#408) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookie Store API (#469) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Native File System API (#390) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Sunday, 2 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 1 February)

Daniel Florey

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 16 February)

Daniel Libby

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Foldables CSS (#472) (Friday, 7 February)

Darien Maillet Valentine

• Re: [whatwg/url] URLSearchParams.appendAll(iterable) (#461) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] URLSearchParams.appendAll(iterable) (#461) (Saturday, 15 February)

Dave Rupert

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Dave Tapuska

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Same-Origin iframe document-access limiting attribute (#397) (Thursday, 13 February)

David Cramer

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Provide ability to encode content from browser/runtime in fetch API. (#653) (Monday, 24 February)

David Spector

• Re: [whatwg/dom] createElementNS() QName/Name confusion (#671) (Monday, 24 February)

Davin Davies

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Monday, 10 February)

dfabulich

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)

Diego

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Foldables CSS (#472) (Monday, 24 February)
• [w3c/manifest] Add reference to (#849) (Thursday, 6 February)

docduo

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Browser caching does not work for the first range request on Chrome and Safari (#1003) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Handling Partial Content / 206 (#144) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Browser caching does not work for the first range request on Chrome and Safari (#1003) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Browser caching does not work for the first range request on Chrome and Safari (#1003) (Monday, 24 February)
• [whatwg/fetch] Browser caching does not work for the first range request on Chrome and Safari (#1003) (Monday, 24 February)

Domenic Denicola

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] appmodif.com (#465) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add state checks to Close() and Enqueue() (#1029) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/storage] Editorial: remove schemeless origin group (#78) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [whatwg/storage] "A schemeless origin group" has maybe been obsoleted? (#77) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Provide ability to encode content from browser/runtime in fetch API. (#653) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Catch errors while upgrading customized built-in elements (#797) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Saturday, 22 February)
• [whatwg/fetch] "Set internalResponse’s CSP list" never sets it on the non-internal response? (#1002) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node insertion step 7.7 isn't upgrading disconnected uncustomized elements that browsers do upgrade (#833) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [infra] Integrating generation of W3C-ready review drafts into build pipeline (#832) (Monday, 10 February)
• [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add checks before Close and Enqueue in tee() (#1027) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Saturday, 1 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC DSCP Control API (#465) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Dragana Damjanovic

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Thursday, 13 February)

Edgar Chen

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Avoid enqueuing "disconnectedCallback" on detached custom elements (#827) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Emilio Cobos Álvarez

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: A Range.prototype.replaceContents(...) (#837) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] [proposal] Node.containingShadowRoot (#826) (Saturday, 1 February)

Eric

• Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n support (#848) (Thursday, 6 February)
• [w3c/manifest] i18n support (#848) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Eric Portis

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add support for Content-DPR response header (#971) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Add support for Content-DPR response header (#971) (Tuesday, 11 February)

ExE Boss

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider renaming number types to match the equivalent WebAssembly types (#843) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Allow ES2020 BigInt values to be passed to operations taking integers. (#828) (Friday, 14 February)
• [heycam/webidl] Consider renaming number types to match the equivalent WebAssembly types (#843) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Editorial refactoring (#10) (Wednesday, 5 February)

François Beaufort

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)

Fred Grott

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Gary Kacmarcik

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Update `clipboard.write()` example to use a `ClipboardItem` list. (#111) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Update `clipboard.write()` example to use a `ClipboardItem` list. (#111) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Update `clipboard.write()` example to use a `ClipboardItem` list. (#111) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Change the type of click and auxclick to PointerEvent (#259) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Change the type of click and auxclick to PointerEvent (#259) (Thursday, 13 February)

Georges Gomes

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)

Giorgi Lagidze

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Very Strange Issue about refresh. (#1504) (Tuesday, 11 February)

gjsman

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Grisha Lyukshin

• Re: [w3c/editing] inputPanelPolicy as a way to control software keyboard (#225) (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] inputPanelPolicy as a way to control software keyboard (#225) (Friday, 14 February)
• [w3c/editing] Editing TF meeting 02/14/2020 - Agenda (#230) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Hart Russell

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Hassaan Hafeez

• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Chrome: serviceWorker.ready() resolves before service worker is active after unregistering (#1505) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Henri Sivonen

• [whatwg/encoding] Label single-byte visualization rows by byte value (#197) (Wednesday, 26 February)

hober

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review different cross-domain import mechanisms and their security models (#446) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Hit Test Module (#463) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Hit Test Module (#463) (Tuesday, 4 February)

HP4k1h5

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] FetchObserver (for a single fetch) (#607) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] FetchObserver (for a single fetch) (#607) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Ian Clelland

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Feature Policy: Document Policies (#408) (Tuesday, 25 February)

ImaCrea

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)

Immánuel!

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)

Ingvar Stepanyan

• [whatwg/fetch] Response constructor should handle SharedArrayBuffer (#1004) (Friday, 28 February)

inoas

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 27 February)

ionas

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Thursday, 27 February)

Jake Archibald

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response constructor should handle SharedArrayBuffer (#1004) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Response constructor should handle SharedArrayBuffer (#1004) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add FetchEvent.handled (#1397) (#1496) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add FetchEvent.handled (#1397) (#1496) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.prototype.arrayBuffer() (#1019) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Tuesday, 4 February)

James Browning

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

James Rosewell

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Jan Miksovsky

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Thursday, 27 February)

Janice Shiu

• [w3c/selection-api] Link editing host to html definition (#119) (Monday, 24 February)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Chore: Add tidyconfig to spec (#110) (Monday, 24 February)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Link mentions of it to its HTML spec definition (#109) (Monday, 24 February)
• [w3c/editing] run html5 tidy on spec (#231) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• [w3c/editing] Remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Monday, 10 February)

Jas Sra

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Jay Harris

• Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n support (#848) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n support (#848) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] i18n support (#848) (Thursday, 6 February)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 1 February)

Joe Bennett

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Johannes Wilm

• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Should execCommand dispatch beforeinput or not? (#200) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Monday, 10 February)

Joshua Bell

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix some incorrect capitalization, and make sections less shouty (#320) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix some incorrect capitalization, and make sections less shouty (#320) (Saturday, 29 February)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Call out browser versions for new features (#321) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Improve example's text around uniqueness. (#318) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Fix some incorrect capitalization, and make sections less shouty (#320) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality (#319) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Improve example's text around uniqueness. (#318) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Where unique key goes (#181) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [w3c/IndexedDB] Editorial: Improve example's text around uniqueness. (#318) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Where unique key goes (#181) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Where unique key goes (#181) (Wednesday, 26 February)

Jouni Koivuviita

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Monday, 17 February)

Jungkee Song

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define Purge Service Worker Registrations (#1506) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Thursday, 13 February)

Justin Fagnani

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight

• [heycam/webidl] Allow `object` for attribute names? (#845) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Friday, 14 February)

Kai Ninomiya

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] EditContext API (#416) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Feature Policy: Document Policies (#408) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Feature Policy: Document Policies (#408) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Foldables CSS (#472) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Foldables CSS (#472) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheduling APIs (#338) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookie Store API (#469) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC DSCP Control API (#465) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC DSCP Control API (#465) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Kevin Cox

• [w3c/manifest] Procedure for moving manifests and Apps (#850) (Sunday, 16 February)

Kinuko Yasuda

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Thursday, 20 February)

Kiwi Browser

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Klaus Weidner

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR DOM Overlay Module (#470) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Krzysztof Kotowicz

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Monday, 10 February)
• [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Monday, 10 February)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 23 February)

Kuzcoo

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Promise-based API (#42) (Monday, 3 February)

L. David Baron

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Delegated Ink Trail (#473) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review different cross-domain import mechanisms and their security models (#446) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] isInputPending (#475) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheduling APIs (#338) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] <link> rel="modulepreload" (#213) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] <link> rel="modulepreload" (#213) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Lars den Bakker

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Friday, 21 February)

Lisa Seeman

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Requesting a TAG review of Personalization Semantics Explainer and  Module 1 (#476) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Lloyd Jones

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Lovish Aggarwal

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 26 February)

Lucas Garron

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Update `clipboard.write()` example to use a `ClipboardItem` list. (#111) (Friday, 28 February)
• [w3c/clipboard-apis] Update `clipboard.write()` example to use a `ClipboardItem` list. (#111) (Friday, 28 February)

Lukasz Anforowicz

• Re: [whatwg/url] What should resolveRelativeUrl(base=..., relative="10.0.0.7:8080/foo.html") return? (#464) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/url] What should resolveRelativeUrl(base=..., relative="10.0.0.7:8080/foo.html") return? (#464) (Friday, 28 February)
• [whatwg/url] What should resolveRelativeUrl(base=..., relative="10.0.0.7:8080/foo.html") return? (#464) (Thursday, 27 February)

Lukasz Olejnik

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookie Store API (#469) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookie Store API (#469) (Sunday, 16 February)

mabian-ms

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Delegated Ink Trail (#473) (Friday, 14 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] inputPanelPolicy as a way to control software keyboard (#225) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (#836) (Saturday, 1 February)

Marcin Lulek

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Marco

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 7 February)

Marcos Cáceres

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] [gamepad-extensions] Align with Web IDL specification (#126) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Relink to its HTML spec definition (#119) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Relink to its HTML spec definition (#119) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Chore: Add tidyconfig to spec (#110) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Chore: Add tidyconfig to spec (#110) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Chore: Add tidyconfig to spec (#110) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Link mentions of it to its HTML spec definition (#109) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Link mentions of it to its HTML spec definition (#109) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3c/gamepad] [gamepad-extensions] Align with Web IDL specification (#126) (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add option to replace title bar with a display a smaller caption control overlay (#847) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] run html5 tidy on spec (#231) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] run html5 tidy on spec (#231) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Add reference to Selection API spec (#227) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Add reference to Selection API spec (#227) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] run html5 tidy on spec (#231) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Allow installed PWA to run on OS login (#845) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] Move some items from contenteditable to HTML? (#228) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/editing] editorial: remove editing host definition and update references to it (#229) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add optional `author` member (#675) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Native File System API (#390) (Monday, 3 February)

Mark Entingh

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Mark Nottingham

• [whatwg/fetch] `only-if-cached` divergence from HTTP (#1001) (Tuesday, 18 February)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)

Mason Freed

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Saturday, 15 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 7 February)

Matias Trujillo

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Matt Falkenhagen

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Matt Giuca

• Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a "tabbed application" mode (#737) (Sunday, 9 February)

Matt Shindala

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cookies not sent across origins with credentials: 'include' and Content-Type: application/json (#997) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cookies not sent across origins with credentials: 'include' and Content-Type: application/json (#997) (Thursday, 27 February)

Mattias Buelens

• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] ReadableStream.from(X) (#1018) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Add checks before Close and Enqueue in tee() (#1027) (Monday, 3 February)
• Re: [whatwg/streams] Reset for TransformStream (and WritableStream?) (#1026) (Saturday, 1 February)

mh0478025

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Sunday, 2 February)

Michael Catanzaro

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 7 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 6 February)

Michael Power

• Re: [whatwg/url] URL.relative proposal (#421) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Michael Quad

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Proposal: Allow servers to take full responsibility for cross-origin access protection (#878) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Header to opt out of opaque redirect (#601) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Saturday, 22 February)

Michael[tm] Smith

• [whatwg/dom] [infra] Integrating generation of W3C-ready review drafts into build pipeline (#832) (Monday, 10 February)

Michał Gołębiowski-Owczarek

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)

Mike West

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HTTP State Tokens (#297) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Friday, 14 February)
• [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Trusted Types (#198) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Revisit `destination` for `<iframe>`, `<frame>`, `<embed>`, and `<object>`. (#948) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] Securer Contexts (#471) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Ms2ger

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Should EnforceRange be allowed on consts and return types? (#842) (Tuesday, 11 February)

mybillserv

• [whatwg/url] appmodif.com (#465) (Friday, 28 February)

Môshe van der Sterre

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Size limits with synchronous WebAssembly functions (#1499) (Thursday, 27 February)

Nathan Schloss

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker spec meetup (#1501) (Sunday, 2 February)

Navid Zolghadr

• Re: [w3c/uievents] Change the type of click and auxclick to PointerEvent (#259) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Change the type of click and auxclick to PointerEvent (#259) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Update index.html with the latest bikeshed (#260) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Update index.html with the latest bikeshed (#260) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/uievents] Update index.html with the latest bikeshed (#260) (Thursday, 13 February)
• [w3c/uievents] Update index.html with the latest bikeshed (#260) (Thursday, 13 February)
• [w3c/uievents] Change the type of click and auxclick to PointerEvent (#259) (Thursday, 13 February)

Nick Albrecht

• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Thursday, 13 February)

Nicole Sullivan

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)

Nigel Megitt

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HR review of IMSC 1.2 FPWD (#474) (Thursday, 20 February)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] HR review of IMSC 1.2 FPWD (#474) (Tuesday, 18 February)

npm1

• [whatwg/dom] Which target could we expose in Event Timing? (#838) (Friday, 28 February)

Peter Linss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review different cross-domain import mechanisms and their security models (#446) (Monday, 24 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] [WebComponents] Custom state pseudo class (#428) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] [WebComponents] Custom state pseudo class (#428) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Gamepad Light Indicator extension API (#362) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Gamepad Light Indicator extension API (#362) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Saturday, 8 February)

Philip Jägenstedt

• Re: [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: August 2019 (#252) (Monday, 24 February)
• [whatwg/xhr] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#267) (Monday, 17 February)
• [whatwg/url] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#463) (Monday, 17 February)
• [whatwg/streams] Review Draft Publication: February 2020 (#1028) (Monday, 17 February)

Pierre-Marie Dartus

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Thursday, 13 February)

Pierre-Yves Gérardy

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update the "convert nodes into a node" to accept arrays of nodes. (#828) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Update the "convert nodes into a node" to accept arrays of nodes. (#828) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Update the "convert nodes into a node" to accept arrays of nodes. (#828) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Piotr Bialecki

• [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebXR Anchors Module (#479) (Friday, 28 February)

Project-x01

• [heycam/webidl] Project (#844) (Saturday, 15 February)

pshaughn

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Node insertion step 7.7 isn't upgrading disconnected uncustomized elements that browsers do upgrade (#833) (Thursday, 13 February)
• [w3c/DOM-Parsing] fragment parsing algorithm appears to be wrong when invoked from innerHTML setter of template element (#61) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• [whatwg/dom] Node insertion step 7.7 isn't upgrading disconnected uncustomized elements that browsers do upgrade (#833) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Throw InvalidNodeTypeError on DocumentType nodes (#118) (Thursday, 6 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] createElementNS() QName/Name confusion (#671) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] What task source do we queue events on? (#117) (Sunday, 2 February)
• [w3c/selection-api] Throw InvalidNodeType on DocumentType nodes (#118) (Saturday, 1 February)
• [w3c/selection-api] What task source do we queue events on? (#117) (Saturday, 1 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Determine whether addRange() and removeAllRanges() should reset direction (#3) (Saturday, 1 February)
• [w3c/selection-api] containsNode could return true for a node that doesn't intersect the selection at all (#116) (Saturday, 1 February)

Qingsi Wang

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Monday, 10 February)

r12a

• Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Where unique key goes (#181) (Wednesday, 26 February)

Reilly Grant

• Re: [w3c/permissions] Consider making `request-permission-to-use` aware of user activation (#194) (Monday, 3 February)

Rich Harris

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Ro Diwa

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify the way CORB should be applied to beacons (#882) (Tuesday, 25 February)

Rob Landers

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 6 February)

ronancremin

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 14 February)

Russell Bicknell

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Saturday, 29 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add Scoped CustomElementRegsitry explainer (#865) (Monday, 24 February)

Ryosuke Niwa

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Thursday, 27 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Relink to its HTML spec definition (#119) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Editorial: Remove redefinition of `editing host`. Relink to its HTML spec definition (#119) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disallow attachShadow(...) for some elements. (#110) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Is "clipboard" permission replaced by "clipboard-read" and "clipboard-write"? (#101) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 16 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Ensure that template instantiation actually improves the platform (#704) (Tuesday, 11 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Determine whether addRange() and removeAllRanges() should reset direction (#3) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Throw InvalidNodeTypeError on DocumentType nodes (#118) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] What task source do we queue events on? (#117) (Tuesday, 4 February)
• Re: [w3c/selection-api] Bahavior without browsing context (#82) (Monday, 3 February)

s0a9d4i2jia5

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Enumeration order of interface members (#432) (Thursday, 6 February)

sam goto

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebOTP API (#391) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] SMS Receiver API (#391) (Wednesday, 12 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] SMS Receiver API (#391) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Scott Haseley

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheduling APIs (#338) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Scheduling APIs (#338) (Saturday, 1 February)

Scott Low

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 13 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Thursday, 13 February)

Serhii Kulykov

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Theming options for shadow roots (#864) (Sunday, 16 February)

Shao, Ting

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add FetchEvent.handled (#1397) (#1496) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add FetchEvent.handled (#1397) (#1496) (Thursday, 20 February)

Shiino Yuki

• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Saturday, 22 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Added a definition of {{StringContext}} extended attribute. (#841) (Friday, 21 February)

Shivani Sharma

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Wednesday, 26 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] HTTP cache partitioning (#943) (Sunday, 16 February)

Simon Pieters

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Thursday, 13 February)

sleevi

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 14 February)

smaug----

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Specify `ParentNode.replaceChildren` implementation. (#835) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Monday, 10 February)

Steve51D

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Sunday, 9 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Friday, 7 February)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Integrate with Fetch Metadata. (#993) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Wednesday, 12 February)

TAMURA, Kent

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Mechanism for setting the tabindex focus flag without sprouting tabindex attribute? (#762) (Tuesday, 25 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] [WebComponents] Custom state pseudo class (#428) (Friday, 21 February)

Thomas Steiner

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Wednesday, 26 February)

Thomas Tortorini

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] The frequency of the security popup (#58) (Thursday, 20 February)
• [w3c/pointerlock] The frequency of the security popup (#58) (Thursday, 20 February)

Tiger Oakes

• Re: [w3c/manifest] BREAKING CHANGE: Replace "badge" with "monochrome" (#833) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3c/manifest] BREAKING CHANGE: Replace "badge" with "monochrome" (#833) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Tim Nguyen

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Timothy Gu

• Re: [whatwg/url] What should resolveRelativeUrl(base=..., relative="10.0.0.7:8080/foo.html") return? (#464) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Friday, 21 February)
• Re: [heycam/webidl] Introduce the observable array type (proxy-based) (#840) (Wednesday, 19 February)

Tomek Wytrębowicz

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] 2020 Spring F2F (#855) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Toms Tilgalis

• Re: [whatwg/url] Bug in methods - entries() and forEach() (#462) (Tuesday, 4 February)

Tony Mobily

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Ensure that template instantiation actually improves the platform (#704) (Friday, 7 February)

Travis Leithead

• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] fix: Add `<dfn>` for the `[CEReactions]` IDL extended attribute (#57) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] fix: Add `<dfn>` for the `[CEReactions]` IDL extended attribute (#57) (Wednesday, 5 February)
• Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] fix: Add `<dfn>` for the `[CEReactions]` IDL extended attribute (#57) (Wednesday, 5 February)

Ulan Degenbaev

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JavaScript Memory API (#386) (Tuesday, 4 February)

v-python

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Make JavaScript Files a Valid Entry Point to a Web Page (#807) (Thursday, 6 February)

Valerii Gusev

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow Caching of POST requests (#977) (Thursday, 20 February)

Victor Costan

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Cookie Store API (#469) (Thursday, 13 February)

vikerman

• Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831) (Tuesday, 11 February)

Vincent Scheib

• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] The frequency of the security popup (#58) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] The frequency of the security popup (#58) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3c/pointerlock] The frequency of the security popup (#58) (Thursday, 20 February)

Wenbo Zhu

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Thursday, 20 February)

Wendy Seltzer

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Curve25519 in Web Cryptography (#466) (Saturday, 8 February)

Wout Mertens

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] FetchObserver (for a single fetch) (#607) (Thursday, 6 February)

Xiaoqian Wu

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] MiniApp URI Scheme (#478) (Friday, 28 February)
• [w3ctag/design-reviews] MiniApp URI Scheme (#478) (Thursday, 27 February)

Yaron Tausky

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Monday, 3 February)
• [w3c/ServiceWorker] Recovering from start failures (#1503) (Monday, 3 February)

Yoav Weiss

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist request headers starting with `Sec-` (#880) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist request headers starting with `Sec-` (#880) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Accept 'sec-'-prefixed headers as CORS-safelisted. (#1000) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 8 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Sunday, 2 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partial freezing of the User-Agent string (#467) (Saturday, 1 February)

Yutaka Hirano

• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Monday, 17 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams should use chunked encoding (#966) (Friday, 14 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)
• Re: [whatwg/fetch] Developer-controlled streams for request/response (#88) (Monday, 10 February)

yuzhehan

• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Friday, 28 February)
• Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Friday, 28 February)
• [w3c/webcomponents] Update Imperative-Shadow-DOM-Distribution-API.md (#866) (Thursday, 27 February)

Yves Lafon

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebRTC DSCP Control API (#465) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] HTTP State Tokens (#297) (Wednesday, 12 February)

Zibri

• Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Expose GeoLocation to workers (#745) (Saturday, 29 February)

Zoltan Kis

• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Thursday, 20 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Wednesday, 19 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)
• Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web NFC (#461) (Tuesday, 18 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 February 2020 22:14:42 UTC