- From: Xiaoqian Wu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 06:16:09 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/478@github.com>
Hello TAG! I'm requesting a TAG review of MiniApp URI Scheme. This is the first proposal from the [MiniApps Ecosystem Community Group](https://www.w3.org/community/miniapps/). The MiniApp URI scheme is a protocol that uniquely corresponds to a specific resource within a mini app. Mini apps are applications that run on the user agent and are based on Web technology combined with native application technology. This specification is supposed to work with the [MiniApp package specification](https://w3c.github.io/miniapp/specs/packaging/)(under development) , which defines the form of resources in the mini app, as well as the specific path in the mini app and the mapped path relationship in the MiniApp URI scheme. - Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://w3c.github.io/miniapp/specs/uri/#introduction - Security and Privacy self-review²: https://w3c.github.io/miniapp/specs/uri/#security-considerations - GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/miniapp/ - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): - Dan Zhou (@zhoudan03), Baidu - Organization/project driving the design: Baidu - External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): Further details: - [*] I have reviewed the TAG's [API Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/) - The group where the work on this design is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): [MiniApps Ecosystem Community Group](https://www.w3.org/community/miniapps/) - Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: - This work is being funded by: You should also know that... [please tell us anything you think is relevant to this review] We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option): 🐛 open issues in our GitHub repo for **each point of feedback** -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/478
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 14:16:22 UTC