- From: Zoltan Kis <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 11:26:13 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2020 19:26:25 UTC
> When a feature requires a permission prompt (because it's powerful), we have to be able to present the user with a clear, concise question. If we can't do that, we can't say the user meaningfully consented when they tap "allow". If we can't say we have meaningful consent from the user, it may be unsafe to expose the feature even behind a permission prompt. Then likely there must exist a deterministic process which takes a permission prompt as input, and outputs whether it is a "clear, concise question", i.e. qualified or not. Otherwise anyone can say that nothing is safe, right? Any links to such a process? It can be review process, whatever, but itself is it adequately and consistently defined somewhere? Who can tell in objective manner what is adequate? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/461#issuecomment-587702781
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2020 19:26:25 UTC