Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: A Range.prototype.replaceContents(...) (#837)

@emilio like I've said, it's an implementation detail, the only concern for vendors is to *not* dispatch mutation events, or custom elements callbacks, if the `parentNode` during the process, is not different form the one present at the moment of the replace.

Like I've also mentioned, if this is not possible, this proposal is useless, and a big miss out from the standard, as you have to take into account minimum 1K of necessary user-land to obtain the exact same result, vDOM or not.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/837#issuecomment-592749575