- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:13:07 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:13:20 UTC
All implementations have a strict ordering of transactions with
overlapping scopes; read-only transactions can run in parallel but
block a later read/write transaction from starting, and the read/write
transactions similarly block later read/write and read-only
transactions.
Tighten up the constraints definition to something precise, and move
the wordy implications into a non-normative aside.
Also, define "overlapping scopes" as a term.
Closes #253
Closes #???
The following tasks have been completed:
* [ ] Confirmed there are no ReSpec/BikeShed errors or warnings.
* [ ] Modified Web platform tests (link to pull request)
Implementation commitment:
* [ ] WebKit (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=)
* [ ] Chromium (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=)
* [ ] Gecko (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=)
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319
-- Commit Summary --
* Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality
-- File Changes --
M index.bs (91)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319.patch
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319.diff
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:13:20 UTC