- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:13:07 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:13:20 UTC
All implementations have a strict ordering of transactions with overlapping scopes; read-only transactions can run in parallel but block a later read/write transaction from starting, and the read/write transactions similarly block later read/write and read-only transactions. Tighten up the constraints definition to something precise, and move the wordy implications into a non-normative aside. Also, define "overlapping scopes" as a term. Closes #253 Closes #??? The following tasks have been completed: * [ ] Confirmed there are no ReSpec/BikeShed errors or warnings. * [ ] Modified Web platform tests (link to pull request) Implementation commitment: * [ ] WebKit (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=) * [ ] Chromium (https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=) * [ ] Gecko (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=) You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319 -- Commit Summary -- * Simplify transaction starting constraints to match reality -- File Changes -- M index.bs (91) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319.patch https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/319
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2020 00:13:20 UTC