Re: [heycam/webidl] Consider renaming number types to match the equivalent WebAssembly types (#843)

Do the IDL types actually have the same semantics as the WebASM types?  Because if not, naming them the same thing is a bit dangerous.

I do agree that it would be nice if the size were just explicit.  But whether changing every single web spec for this is worthwhile is less clear.

One option would be to add the sized typedefs explicitly and see whether people actually use them...

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/843#issuecomment-586079310