Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#831)

I than case, I think my second point holds all the more strongly: someone should sit down and develop a working prototype of WC hydration that works great with excellent performance. (Ideally it would somehow perform better or at least no slower than comparable non-WC hydration solutions.)

To be clear, today we don't use shadow DOM partly because we do hydration, and shadow DOM doesn't work well with hydration. If WCs offered a superior hydration solution to non-WC hydration, then I think we *would* switch over.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/831#issuecomment-585936624