- From: Kai Ninomiya <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:35:07 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 06:35:10 UTC
WebIDL specifies that a`[EnforceRange]` types are not valid for `readonly attribute`s. However, it doesn't seem to specify whether they are valid for: - `const`s (see [`GPUBufferUsageFlags` and `GPUBufferUsage.*`](https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#typedefdef-gpubufferusageflags)) - method return types (see usages of [`GPUFenceValue`](https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#typedefdef-gpufencevalue)) It seems like all 3 should be the same. That said, I would argue that `EnforceRange` be valid in all of these cases, just that it would have no effect. This makes sense because: (a) it allows a `typedef` of an `[EnforceRange]` integer type to be used consistently and (b) it matches the behavior of reading from a non-readonly `attribute` (`[EnforceRange]` is meaningless/ignored). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/842
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2020 06:35:10 UTC