[ALL] Student projects SKOS & SemWeb
[OEP] A possible alternative term for fluent
[HTML] Meeting record for review, rdf-in-xhtml tf 2005-06-27
[PORT] FW: SKOS XML syntax?
How to state simple facts in RDF
- Re: How to state simple facts in RDF
- RE: How to state simple facts in RDF
- RE: How to state simple facts in RDF
- RE: How to state simple facts in RDF
[VM] Report of 2005-06-21 telecon
[ALL] Agenda 27 June telecon 1700 UTC
Interest in GRDDL from IPTC
Re: [protege-owl] Re: Why not standart RDF reification
Typo in Namespace for http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values/books3.owl
Typo in XML Representation for Approach 3
TAG has resolved httpRange-14
- Re: TAG has resolved httpRange-14
- Re: TAG has resolved httpRange-14
- Re: TAG has resolved httpRange-14
[OEP] status of drafts
[VM] Vocabulary Management telecon - Jun 21, 1300 UTC
[OEP] The n-ary relations draft is ready for outside review
[All] change in telecon date: now Mondays 1700 UTC
meeting record: 2005-06-16 SWBPD telecon
[Liaison] Latest ODM Specification
httpRange-14 Options
[VM] Report on 2005-06-07 telecon
[ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- RE: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- Re: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- Re: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- Re: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- Re: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
- Re: [ALL] Agenda WG telecon 16 June 1700 UTC
[ALL] agenda to be posted later today
[OEP] Telecon tomorrow (thurs)
[WORM0'5] 3rd International Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies
[SE] Minutes of SETF Telecon 07-06-05
[SE,ALL] ODA draft version for WG review
[SE] Essay on modelling costs
[ALL] Announcement of W3C SKOS Core first public Working Drafts
Apologies for Thursday's telecon
Re: [WNET] Fwd: WordNet in RDF
Re: [VM] Agenda for June 7 telecon
- Agenda June 7 - Point 2 RE: [VM] Agenda for June 7 telecon
- [VM] Looking at Javadoc, dreaming of RDFdoc
Re: [VM] Telecon report, May 12
- Agenda for June 7 telecon? RE: [VM] Telecon report, May 12
- VMTF telecon logistics [was: Re: [VM] Telecon report, May 12]
comment on Guus's note - Re: [OEP] OWL restrictions
- Re: comment on Guus's note - Re: [OEP] OWL restrictions
- RE: comment on Guus's note - Re: [OEP] OWL restrictions
- RE: comment on Guus's note - Re: [OEP] OWL restrictions