- From: McBride, Brian <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:06:38 +0100
- To: "Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@ontopia.net>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lars > Marius Garshol > Sent: 29 June 2005 14:11 > To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: How to state simple facts in RDF > > > > * Brian McBride > | > | This question came up in RDFCore. The suggestion at the > time was to > | use rdf:type, e.g. > | > | Eg::company rdf:type eg:BankruptCompany . > > That was one of the alternatives being considered, but as I > write in my reply to Mike Uschold, that alternative causes > difficulties. Were any other alternatives suggested? The other option at the time was a binary valued relation e.g. Eg:company eg:isBankrupt "true"^^xsd:boolean . Brian
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2005 15:06:47 UTC