- From: Gian Piero Zarri <zarri@noos.fr>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:59:19 +0200
- To: protege-owl@smi.stanford.edu
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <42BAC037.7050902@noos.fr>
Dear Vincent, Thank you for your interest in NKRL. With respect to the "Best Practices" vocabulary, I know only what you also probably now. When she announced, few days ago, a new version of her (with Alan Rector) document about "N-ary Relations", Natasha Noy also spoke of a "forthcoming note" intended to introduce a "standard vocabulary for describing that something is an n-ary relations and for defining mappings for n-ary relations between RDF/ OWL and other languages". I am waiting, like you... Regards, G.P. Zarri Vincent Hikida wrote: > <> > > Have a look at NKRL, e.g., > http://e-msha.msh-paris.fr/Agora/Tableaux%20de%20bord/Euforbia/Background%20Information/NKRL/ > : > > EXIST SUBJ JOHN_: PARIS_ > date-1: 15-june-2005 > date-2: 10-july-2005 > > You will find there something of (probably) more theoretically sound > and stable than any W3C - SW Best Practice "vocabulary". > > Regards, > > > Gian Piero ZARRI > zarri@noos.fr, gpzarri@paris4.sorbonne.fr > <>Thank you for the reference. On brief examination, NKRL seems to > have the ability express "effectivity". I don't know anything about > the "W3C SW Best Practice vocabulary" or how it relates to OWL. Do you > think it should be extended along the lines of NKRL at least as it > relates to time?
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 13:59:23 UTC