W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > June 2005

Re: [protege-owl] Re: Why not standart RDF reification

From: Natasha Noy <noy@smi.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:17:37 -0700
Message-Id: <8B8D5877-F46E-4C34-A0BA-4BBF2374FF6A@smi.stanford.edu>
Cc: protege-owl@smi.stanford.edu, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
To: Gian Piero Zarri <zarri@noos.fr> 

>
>
>> <>Thank you for the reference. On brief examination, NKRL seems to  
>> have the ability express "effectivity". I don't know anything  
>> about the "W3C SW Best Practice vocabulary" or how it relates to  
>> OWL. Do you think it should be extended along the lines of NKRL at  
>> least as it relates to time?

As far as time, the plan is that it will be based on the OWL time  
vocabulary:
http://www.isi.edu/~pan/OWL-Time.html

Natasha
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 17:17:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 27 January 2023 01:58:24 UTC