- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:43:24 -0700
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Chris,
Unfortunately, I have a conflict tomorrow. Please let me know if there
are action items,
particularly with regard to the UML stuff, that I can help with.
Best regards,
Elisa
Christopher Welty wrote:
>We will have our regular bi-weekly OEP telecon tomorrow at 3PM EDT (1900
>UT)
>Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 passcode 7927# ('SWBPD')
>
>Agenda:
>We had unfinished business regarding the N-ary note (see
>[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005May/0172.html]),
>including names for the patterns (which I think was resolved in email),
>the issue of having argument numbers in the n-ary vocabulary, and the
>relation to UML association classes.
>
>Alan, if you can attend the meeting, we can discuss the simple part note.
>Can you make it?
>
>Aldo, please send an email message regarding your QCR comments made during
>the last telecon.
>
>-Chris
>
>Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
>IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
>
>Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
>Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web:
>http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 18:43:34 UTC