- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:43:24 -0700
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Hi Chris, Unfortunately, I have a conflict tomorrow. Please let me know if there are action items, particularly with regard to the UML stuff, that I can help with. Best regards, Elisa Christopher Welty wrote: >We will have our regular bi-weekly OEP telecon tomorrow at 3PM EDT (1900 >UT) >Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 passcode 7927# ('SWBPD') > >Agenda: >We had unfinished business regarding the N-ary note (see >[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005May/0172.html]), >including names for the patterns (which I think was resolved in email), >the issue of having argument numbers in the n-ary vocabulary, and the >relation to UML association classes. > >Alan, if you can attend the meeting, we can discuss the simple part note. >Can you make it? > >Aldo, please send an email message regarding your QCR comments made during >the last telecon. > >-Chris > >Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group >IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA > >Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455 >Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web: >http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/ > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 18:43:34 UTC