[Bug 20535] New: consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
[Bug 20528] New: Definition of [[Prototype]] for the interface prototype object is confusing
[Bug 20527] New: Comment about NamedPropertiesObject is incorrect
[Bug 20481] New: Grammar Fixes needed: Dominique's feedback + Microsoft's feedback
Generating random WebIDL fragments from grammar
[Bug 20478] New: Grammar allows "static;" as a valid operation
[Bug 20477] New: serializer grammar doesn't expose "attribute" as a valid value
[Bug 15765] Replaceable interface
[Bug 20475] New: Grammar allows "- Infinity", but not "- 1"
[Bug 20458] New: 4.2.22: converting IDL value to IDL type?
[Bug 20456] New: 4.2.24.1: wrong conversion
[Bug 20455] New: converting to an ECMAScript value [of a specified type??]
[Bug 20453] New: 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
[Bug 20452] New: 4.2.16: extraneous "the"
Partial conclusions on WindowProxy and ES5 invariants
[Bug 20444] New: 4.*: "descriptor { ... }"
[Bug 20443] New: 4.4.6: "is not of the enumeration’s values"
[Bug 20442] New: 4.2.24: <ul> should be <ol>
[Bug 20441] New: algorithms not marked as such
[Bug 20440] New: 4.4.1.1: "of it type list"
[Bug 20439] New: 4.4.6: <span class="desc">
[WebIDL] Definition of "single operation interface" questions
Standardizing Console object
[Bug 20422] New: 4.2.21: "then then"
[Bug 20419] New: 4.2.24.2: missing "then"?
[Bug 20407] New: allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
Need to define same-origin policy for WebIDL operations/getters/setters
Major WebIDL2.js update
Interaction of non-configurable attributes and named getters
WindowProxy objects violate ES5 invariants
- Re: WindowProxy objects violate ES5 invariants
- Re: WindowProxy objects violate ES5 invariants
- Re: WindowProxy objects violate ES5 invariants
[Bug 20361] New: Grammar is wrong for serializers
WebIDL syntax tests
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
[Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
[Bug 18846] Editorial - 4.2.20 Should 'D' be 'dictionary'?
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
Call for Review: Web IDL Testing document
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 17749] [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 17719] Consider throwing when attribute setter is called without an argument.
[Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
[Bug 18421] Cycle language about dictionaries needs s/interface/dictionary/
[Bug 18420] Cycles via dictionary members should probably be prohibited
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18023] Typo DOMString
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
[Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
- Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
- Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
- Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
- Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
- Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together
[Bug 19101] consider allowing nested enum definitions
[Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
[webidl] Spec for callback interface interface objects is self-contradictory in places
[Bug 16604] RFE: add unsigned byte as synonym for octet
[Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
[Bug 17719] Consider throwing when attribute setter is called without an argument.
[Bug 17749] [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit
[Bug 18023] Typo DOMString
[Bug 18352] Note about Object.prototype.toString is unclear
[Bug 18421] Cycle language about dictionaries needs s/interface/dictionary/
[Bug 18420] Cycles via dictionary members should probably be prohibited
[Bug 16455] Using platform object example
[Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
[Bug 18846] Editorial - 4.2.20 Should 'D' be 'dictionary'?
[Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
[Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
[Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
[Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
[Bug 19101] consider allowing nested enum definitions
[Bug 18908] Consider disallowing expandos on objects with a named getter but no named setter
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
[Bug 20225] New: don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
[Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
RE: RSA blind signatures
[Bug 11195] HTMLCollection wants to be an array
[Bug 20159] New: Introduce attributes for DOMString coercion
- [Bug 20159] Introduce attributes for DOMString coercion
- [Bug 20159] Introduce attributes for DOMString coercion
[Bug 20158] New: Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
[Bug 19101] consider allowing nested enum definitions
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 20086] New: Exception message
- [Bug 20086] Exception message
- [Bug 20086] Exception message
- [Bug 20086] Exception message
- [Bug 20086] Exception message
- [Bug 20086] Exception message
New ES6 draft is available
ECMAScript and chaining
[Bug 20020] New: Support subclassing Array
[Bug 20019] New: Support subclassing ES6 Map
- [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map
- [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map
- [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map
- [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map
[Bug 20008] New: allow [Unforgeable] on an interface
[Bug 19988] New: add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
[WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
- Re: [WebIDL] Allowing specifications to opt in to throwing on sets of enumerated attributes to invalid values
[Bug 19936] New: consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
Re: RegExp support in WebIDL
Support for generators
Re: CSP 1.1 DOM design
[WebIDL] Typing of integer-token optional argument default values and constant values is unclear
[WebIDL] Callback functions and callback interfaces should allow optional arguments sanely
[Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
WebIDL2.js
[Bug 19778] New: Wrong regex for integer
[Bug 19777] New: Grammar issue with qualified operations
TPAC F2F DOM2 Selectors API review
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
Small grammar problem
Extended attribute grammar too complex?
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
[Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
- Re: IDL: special DOMString that converts to Unicode
Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
WebIDL grammar allows "static;", which seems broken
[webidl] Spec is unclear on what it means to support indexed/named properties
[WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
- Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
- Re: [WebIDL] Would it make sense to add annotations for "creates a new object each time" and "always returns the same object"?
Interaction of dictionaries and platform objects is a bit weird
[Bug 19571] New: .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
[WebIDL][ES6] Include optional arguments in "length"
- Re: [WebIDL][ES6] Include optional arguments in "length"
- Re: [WebIDL][ES6] Include optional arguments in "length"
New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft
[WebIDL] Type conversions triggered by "any" can be lossy
Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
- Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters
Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: [whatwg] Document referrer and script entry point
- Re: Document referrer and script entry point