- From: David Sheets <kosmo.zb@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 20:41:01 -0800
- To: bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org> wrote: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17508 > > Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution|--- |INVALID > > --- Comment #4 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> --- > Sorry, the trailing comma look pretty ugly to me. How does this opinion resolve the bug as invalid? Either web-apps or WebIDL is in error. Is it really worth it to fail to parse WebIDL because of a (useful for autogenerated lists) trailing comma? David,
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 04:41:52 UTC