[Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter


Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |robin@w3.org

--- Comment #2 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Feels ugly to me. Reminds me of PutForwards.

Is it the syntax or the feature that you find ugly? If it's the syntax, we can
certainly bikeshed it, e.g.:

    attribute FileList?/(FileList? or sequence<Blob>) files;

and many other variants. But I don't think that we can dodge the fact that the
feature itself represents a genuine need.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 10:26:14 UTC