- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:00:07 +1100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On 14/12/12 7:20 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 12/11/12 9:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> I think the new restriction should probably be: >> >> If an interface inherits from another interface that has an >> [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute, then it and all its consequential >> interfaces MUST NOT have an attribute with the same identifier. > > Actually, more like: > > If interface A inherits from interface B, and either B or one of its > consequential interfaces has a [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute, > then A and all its consequential interfaces MUST NOT have an > attribute with the same identifier. Agree: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.598;r2=1.599;f=h
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 23:00:44 UTC