- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 17:52:37 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-19571-3890-ZdkFmqZOM8@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19571 --- Comment #6 from Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> --- Thanks for the link, Rick! I read through it briefly, and didn't come away with any specific reasons to stick with the current spec other than "it better matches existing built-ins, and we've discussed this detail far more than its importance warrants, so please let's just stick with what we have". To be honest, though, that doesn't seem like a bad reason to me. Even leaving aside the rest parameter, .length is of dubious value anyway. Plus, three out of four browser engines just always set .length to 0 for WebIDL operations, so it's not like it's really going to be useful to anyone anyway. I still favor changing it based on the arguments I've seen so far, but if the ES people have discussed it a lot and change looks unlikely, I'm not going to try arguing. It's not very important and we all have better things to do. So I'd be okay with WONTFIX as a resolution here, and Mozilla can land the change to match the WebIDL spec. (An alternative would be for WebIDL to deviate from ES, but that seems even less desirable.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 20 October 2012 17:52:38 UTC