W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2012

Extended attribute grammar too complex?

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:15:23 +0100
Message-ID: <508DAE7B.7000304@w3.org>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org

I've been looking at the extended attribute syntax and I wonder if it 
isn't just too complex.

Rules 61-66 and 68 define a somewhat elaborate construction in which 
extended attributes can be built using nested parentheses, brackets, etc.

In practice however that never seems to be used, and only rules 86-89 
(which are much simpler) ever seem to be used.

Am I missing something or could the former just be dropped?

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 22:15:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:07 UTC