- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 08:21:33 -0800
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
On 11/15/12 8:03 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Yeah, I realized that after I sent it… but assume Version 0 works like WebIDL does today. Then any sane implementor would formally object to a spec changing behavior from non-throwing to throwing. That's just not an OK thing to do. I'd hope no sane spec author would even consider it. > So, a value may or may not be set (as it may fall back to a default), so you need to confirm that it actually worked. If Version 1 switches to [strict], then you need the above check to catch Version 0, no? In the hypothetical case of insane editors and implementors.... yes. ;) -Boris
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:22:07 UTC