- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:20:05 -0500
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On 12/11/12 9:55 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > I think the new restriction should probably be: > > If an interface inherits from another interface that has an > [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute, then it and all its consequential > interfaces MUST NOT have an attribute with the same identifier. Actually, more like: If interface A inherits from interface B, and either B or one of its consequential interfaces has a [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute, then A and all its consequential interfaces MUST NOT have an attribute with the same identifier. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 20:20:36 UTC