- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:25:15 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20225 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |annevk@annevk.nl --- Comment #12 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- The method as defined at http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-htmlcollection-nameditem makes sense for an HTMLPropertiesCollection as far as it goes, no? But note that HTMLCollection defines the return value to be "object" precisely so that people who want to define other behavior can. If we're not planning to make use of that functionality, we should change HTMLCollection to just return Element? from namedItem and let places that want to return something else override the method as you're doing here. Basically, either we should be using the extensibility hook that DOMCore already provides here or we should stop providing that hook if it has no consumers. The current situation leads to confusion because people have to start worrying about why the hook is being provided and whether they're reading the spec right. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 03:25:18 UTC