- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:43:35 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18362
Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> ---
I don't know, I tend to think that for example
interface Blah {
stringifier readonly attribute DOMString something;
};
means
Object.defineProperty(Blah.prototype, "something",
{ get: function() { return <internal state>; }, ...);
Blah.prototype.toString = function() { return this.something; }
rather than
Object.defineProperty(Blah.prototype, "something",
{ get: function() { return <internal state>; }, ...);
Blah.prototype.toString = function() { return <internal state>; }
and I feel like it is a more natural way of implementing it. It's in line with
what we're doing for [PutForwards], too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 04:43:38 UTC