- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 11:36:09 +1000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.com>, Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
Boris Zbarsky: > I believe they should remain accessor properties. > > I think making them all [Replaceable] is likely to cause compat problems. OK. > Apart from that, the only difference betewen #1 and #2 is strict-mode > behavior, right? Yes. And we can work around the problem in strict mode if we want, by giving the accessor properties setters that do nothing. Should we do that?
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2012 01:36:47 UTC