W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:35:51 -0500
Message-ID: <50CA6657.6040101@mit.edu>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On 12/13/12 6:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 14/12/12 7:20 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> Actually, more like:
>>    If interface A inherits from interface B, and either B or one of its
>>    consequential interfaces has a [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute,
>>    then A and all its consequential interfaces MUST NOT have an
>>    attribute with the same identifier.
> Agree:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.598;r2=1.599;f=h

Actually, we might want s/attribute/member/ in that last line or 
something.  Don't want to shadow an unforgeable attribute with an 
operation either, right?

Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 23:36:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:08 UTC