- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:32:13 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20407
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackalmage@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This would not be conversion, but creating new objects from the
> data passed to setter.
I believe Anne means that a setFoo/getFoo pair, where setFoo accepts a wider
variety of things but getFoo returns a specific type, is already possible,
acceptable, and widely used. Thus, why is it unacceptable to do the same with
an attribute?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 17:32:17 UTC