New Editor's Drafts of RDFa Lite 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1
Telecons cancelled through January 2012
Heads up: RDFa 1.1 headed into Last Call in January 2012
RDFa media type fragment interpretation (TAG-ACTION-509)
Telecon Agenda - December 15th 2011, 1400 UTC
Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118
RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 updated
Wrong definition of @vocab in rdfa-core
Re: ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
RDFa Core and XHTML-RDFa updated
URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
- Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
- Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
- Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
- Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
- Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
Editorial issue on default context
RDF Web Apps ISSUE-124 (was: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD)
ISSUE-124 (RDFa Lite Document Conformance): Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different? [RDFa 1.1 Lite]
Fwd: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD
Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
ISSUE-123 (HTMLLiterals): Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce the concept of an HTMLLiteral? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
ISSUE-122 (@datatypeLibrary attribute): Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce a new @datatypeLibrary attribute [RDFa 1.1 Core]
HTML WG review of RDFa Lite
RE: <time> values in HTML5
Re: Would RDFa support Named Graph ?
Re: Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
- Re: <time> values in HTML5