Saturday, 31 December 2011
Thursday, 22 December 2011
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- Re: RDFa media type fragment interpretation (TAG-ACTION-509)
 - RDFa media type fragment interpretation (TAG-ACTION-509)
 
Monday, 12 December 2011
Friday, 9 December 2011
Monday, 12 December 2011
Saturday, 10 December 2011
- Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118
 - Re: ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
 - Re: ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
 - Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118
 - Re: Editorial issue on default context
 - Re: Editorial issue on default context
 - Re: Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118
 
Friday, 9 December 2011
- RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 updated
 - Re: Editorial issue on default context
 - Re: Wrong definition of @vocab in rdfa-core
 - Wrong definition of @vocab in rdfa-core
 - Re: Editorial issue on default context
 - Re: ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
 - Re: Editorial issue on default context
 
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- RDFa Core and XHTML-RDFa updated
 - Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
 - Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
 - Re: URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
 - URGENT: Support for RDFa Working Draft publications
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
 - Editorial issue on default context
 - Re: Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
 - Re: ISSUE-124 (RDFa Lite Document Conformance): Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different? [RDFa 1.1 Lite]
 - RDF Web Apps ISSUE-124 (was: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD)
 - ISSUE-124 (RDFa Lite Document Conformance): Should HTML + RDFa Lite and HTML+RDFa Document Conformance requirements be different? [RDFa 1.1 Lite]
 
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Fwd: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD
 - Telecon Agenda - December 8th 2011, 1400 UTC
 - ISSUE-123 (HTMLLiterals): Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce the concept of an HTMLLiteral? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 - ISSUE-122 (@datatypeLibrary attribute): Should RDFa Core 1.1 introduce a new @datatypeLibrary attribute [RDFa 1.1 Core]
 
Monday, 5 December 2011
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - HTML WG review of RDFa Lite
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
 - Re: Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
 - Re: Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - RE: <time> values in HTML5
 
Sunday, 4 December 2011
Saturday, 3 December 2011
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: Would RDFa support Named Graph ?
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
 
Friday, 2 December 2011
- Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5
 - Re: <time> values in HTML5