- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:17:18 +0100
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Guys, I have seen the resolution of last week on the link relations (and I am happy with the resolution). On the purely editorial level: - I have modified http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html to include three terms, namely describedby (that one was already there), license and role - I have created a new http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.html file to list the XHTML+RDFa terms. I guess a reference to this default context should be added to the XHTML+RDFa language profile - I have kept the URI http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/html-rdfa-1.1.html for now, but it does not define anything Is this ok? Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 08:17:53 UTC