- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 19:55:29 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
I'm having some issues with these documents. Firstly, what is the canonical URIs for these documents? The document at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html has an @about of http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1.html. Which is it intended to be? I note that Shane's used the dated version in the spec. http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html issues: * Line 5 has too many quotes, and prevents the rest of the document from parsing as XML, which I do for XHTML documents. * the <br> on line 303 is not self-closing Others look okay. Gregg On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > Guys, > > I have seen the resolution of last week on the link relations (and I am happy with the resolution). On the purely editorial level: > > - I have modified http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html to include three terms, namely describedby (that one was already there), license and role > - I have created a new http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.html file to list the XHTML+RDFa terms. I guess a reference to this default context should be added to the XHTML+RDFa language profile > - I have kept the URI http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/html-rdfa-1.1.html for now, but it does not define anything > > Is this ok? > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 00:56:28 UTC