Tuesday, 16 February 2010
Monday, 15 February 2010
- RDFa Task Force mailing list is closed
- Re: Finalizing the RDFa WG transition
- Finalizing the RDFa WG transition
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
- Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- Re: where are Uppercase reserved words specified? (Test #134)
- XML Literals and canonicalization [was: swap-scala's RDFa ...]
- Re: CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- Re: where are Uppercase reserved words specified? (Test #134)
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- CURIEs and blank nodes (Test #140)
- where are Uppercase reserved words specified? (Test #134)
Monday, 8 February 2010
- Re: CURIE syntax: prefix separator required or not?
- Re: CURIE syntax: prefix separator required or not?
- CURIE syntax: prefix separator required or not?
- Re: RDFa Test Harness permanently moved to Test Suite
Sunday, 7 February 2010
- RE: RDFa Test Harness permanently moved to Test Suite
- Re: RDFa Test Harness permanently moved to Test Suite
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- Migration to RDFa WG mailing list
Saturday, 6 February 2010
- RDFa Test Harness permanently moved to Test Suite
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- Re: swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
- swap-scala's RDFa parser deployed on google app engine
Thursday, 4 February 2010
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- Re: "RDFa Processing in detail" gets some details wrong?
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- Re: parsing lists of CURIES
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- Re: parsing lists of CURIES
- Re: @datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: goofy @datatype values fall back to plain literal or not?
- parsing lists of CURIES
- goofy @datatype values fall back to plain literal or not?
- @datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral
- Re: old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
- old NCName used in CURIE syntax by design?
- "RDFa Processing in detail" gets some details wrong?
- RDFa 1.1 Cross Origin Resource Sharing test site
- February 4th and 11th telecons canceled
- 3rd CfP: LDOW2010 - 3rd International Workshop on Linked Data on the Web, at WWW2010, Raleigh, USA
Tuesday, 2 February 2010
- Re: Hash URIs and RDFa documents
- Re: Hash URIs and RDFa documents
- RDFa Working Group Launched!
- Re: Hash URIs and RDFa documents
- Re: Hash URIs and RDFa documents
- Re: RDFa DOM API Editors Draft
- Re: Hash URIs and RDFa documents