- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:16:37 -0600
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
My code fails Test #140, so I'm checking the spec to find out why. In section 7. CURIE Syntax Definition http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#s_curies we find: A CURIE is a representation of a full URI. That contradicts other parts of the spec. I suggest making it true by constraining the syntax of CURIEs to exclude the _:foo construct. The other alternative is to say something like: A CURIE is a representation of either an absolute IRI or a blank node. or fudge it a la: A CURIE typically represents an absolute URI. (does the RDFa spec exclude IRIs on purpose? It's somewhat lax about the difference between a URI (which, strictly speaking, is always absolute) and a URI reference (which may be relative). I wonder if it similarly uses URI where the standard term is actually IRI.) -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 9 February 2010 02:16:39 UTC